‘I’m selling now to beat crash,’ says disillusioned property investor

Allan Smith with his eight-year-old daughter Eva at his investment property in Helensvale.  Paul Harris

By Duncan Hughes   21 January 2019   Australian Financial Review

Allan Smith, a Queensland corporate accountant, is selling the investment property he bought 10 years ago because he is “tired of losing money” and wants to get out before there is a market crash.

Mr Smith’s three-bedroom townhouse in Helensvale, north of the Gold Coast, cost him about $300,000 and has returned only about 20 per cent in capital growth, or about 2 per cent a year, which is less then he could have made on a fixed-term deposit.

The property has been no problem to rent but income did not cover total costs and has been negatively geared.

“I am selling now to beat the house price crash,” the married father of two children said.

“There’s a lot of talk about big corrections and I don’t want to be caught.” 

Mr Smith, 45, is planning to reinvest in a balanced portfolio of equities and fixed income generating a return of about 6 per cent.

He invested in 2009 in the belief that property prices doubled every 10 years, which is a typical sales pitch used by real estate agents.

Prices for properties in popular Sydney and Melbourne locations did more than double, fuelled by record low interest rates, strong population growth, exuberant markets and supply pressure.

Government statistics reveal the share of investors in Australia’s home loan market has also dropped to its lowest level since 2009 because of weakening sentiment and tighter credit.

 

Investor lending is down more than 22 per cent on the same time last year.

Mr Smith has grown disillusioned with low rental returns and increasingly fearful that a market crash will slash his slender capital gains.

“I’m sick of losing money all the time,” he said about negative gearing. “It has not been a great investment and I am now worried it will get caught when the property bubble bursts.”

Mr Smith said he might then consider buying back into the market at a cheaper price.

 

He is growing more anxious as prices fall, some lender rates rise, incomes remain static and the likelihood grows of tax changes if a federal Labor government is elected this year.

Cate Bakos, a buyers’ agent for Melbourne-based Cate Bakos property, believes lower prices and increased supply will attract more buyers back into the market.

Ms Bakos said tight credit was the biggest problem weakening demand, particularly checking income and spending details provided by applicants.

“Banks are still being very picky,” she said.

Demand is resilient in the first time home buyer $400,000 to $700,000 range where first time purchasers qualify for exemption from stamp duty.

Some analysts estimate there has been a five-fold increase in the number of loan applications rejected by banks during December compared to the previous year as lenders continue to crack down on lending standards.

“With prices forecast to keep dipping, it’s only natural that some home owners and investors would be looking to cut their losses or get out of property entirely,” said Graham Cooke, insights manager for Finder which monitors rates and fees.

“A positive take-out of all this is that housing continues to get more affordable for those who have been saving a deposit and waiting to get into the market.”

Mortgage brokers, who act as an intermediary between lenders and banks, claim concerns about the findings of the Hayne royal commission are adding to lender nervousness.

Sentiment is also being weakened, particularly for off-the-plan buyers, by public alarm about building problems, such as the defective Opal apartment building in Sydney’s west.

Phil Dwyer, national president of the Builders Collective of Australia, said Opal was “having an enormous impact on property buyers, particularly off-the-plan buyers considering a high-rise apartment”.

Mr Dwyer, an award-winning builder of more than 45 years’ experience, added: “It is refreshing potential buyers’ memories about previous incidents involving high-rise apartments and shoddy workmanship.”

Combustible cladding on Melbourne’s Lacrosse building caused millions of dollars in damage after fire raced up 13 storeys of the building in as little as 10 minutes in November 2014.

It also sparked a row between tenants and builders about who was responsible for the fire and cost of repairs.

Major lenders are responding to the mixed messages by focusing on high quality loan applicants with a deposit of about 20 per cent who meet their tough new income and spending requirements.

Original article here

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s